Merriam-Webster's Unabridged (v. 2.9.7) Разработано Paragon Software |
Merriam-Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged - America's most comprehensive dictionary.
------------
Dictionary Details:
• Over 257,244 entries and 700,000 definitions
• 143,000 etymologies describing word origins and 100,000 quotations
• 1,100 synonymy paragraphs
• Special updated Addenda Section of new words and meanings
• Extended Thesaurus.
------------
Application Features:
• Audio pronunciations made by native speakers
• Word of the Day—a random dictionary definition daily
• Enhanced customization options allow you to choose background color and enlarge or reduce font size for your comfort
• New input methods make dictionary use more convenient than ever. Search by voice with Google Voice recognition service, take a picture of text and translate it with Google Goggles, or enter the word with your own handwriting using Paragon's PenReader handwriting recognition software.
• Wildcard Search if you are unsure of the exact word spelling. Use “?” and “*” symbols to replace the missing letters.
• No Internet connection required.
------------
About Merriam-Webster
Merriam-Webster Inc. acquired the rights to revise and publish Noah Webster’s dictionaries in 1843. Since then, Merriam-Webster has maintained an ongoing commitment to innovation, scholarship, and love of language. Each Merriam-Webster dictionary is the product of extensive research and painstaking writing and editing conducted by the largest group of full-time lexicographers in North America. Today, the company continues as the leader in language reference publishing with bestselling reference books and electronic references, popular Web sites and a range of licensed products.
tags: merriam, webster, translate, translation,vocabulary, paragon, software, reference, english language
|
|
|
|
[2012-12-15] A Google User: Beautiful! The ultimate extension of a dictionary app, it's great to have so many definitions, senses and options. Very nice UI, too. |
|
[2012-11-11] A Google User: Best. Seiji Most comprehensive English dictionary. Great. |
|
[2012-11-03] A Google User: Love it Great |
|
[2012-09-17] A Google User: Disappointing No voice search. No refund due to time downloading. Sicily not in dictionary. |
|
[2012-07-17] A Google User: Great offline dictionary app Excellent lexicon. All words in app searchable. Infrequently updated. Does not integrate with ereader apps like nook. |
|
[2012-05-23] A Google User: They removed the word history!! Booooo A much needed improvement. Hopefully the developer will continue to support it this app. |
|
[2012-04-24] A Google User: This does not have all the words of the printed version! Please fix the icon! On Google play one sees the square Websters Third New International dictionary, but after installing it one is stuck with the generic ugly round icon. Other than that (and the lack of bookmarks) it is a very solid dictionary. |
|
[2012-04-21] A Google User: Solid dictionary; app needs polish Some pronunciations do not play, and some are mismatched/ wrong word. Excellent dictionary content, but also refers to tables/ photos that don't exist. |
|
[2012-03-30] A Google User: Getting better... I'm liking the new changes and added features! Changed rating from 3 to 4. Please keep it up. I would recommend a more streamlined way during the main screen. Instead of starting from A on, It would be nice to start by clicking on a letter then filtering for my word. Overall, better! |
|
[2011-12-13] A Google User: A total waste. Not at all worth the money. |
|
[2011-08-31] A Google User: The UI/functionality is most basic. But the dictionary itself is solid and is a good buy at the 50% discount being offered now. |
|
[2011-08-28] A Google User: Fabulous bargain compared to on-line subscription plus you get superb android app. If I could give more than 5 stars I would. |
|
[2011-08-15] Chandan: The UI functionality is most basic. But the dictionary itself is solid and is a good buy at the 50% discount being offered now. |
|
[2011-06-20] A Google User: I love it and use it all the time. Plenty of good definitions per word, good etymologies, and good synonym studies. |
|
[2011-06-20] Jeffrey: I love it and use it all the time. Plenty of good definitions per word, good etymologies, and good synonym studies. |
|
[2011-06-15] A Google User: Best dictionary app in Android market. Expensive, but well worth it. No change log for manual update. 1 star for lack of transparency. Evo 2.3, NS 2.3 |
|
[2011-06-15] Phil: Best dictionary app in Android market. Expensive, but well worth it. No change log for manual update. 1 star for lack of transparency. Evo 2.3, NS 2.3 |
|
[2011-03-29] A Google User: Good dictionary of course, as was ifs Palm predecessor, but you can't change the font size. Not quite a deal breaker but after all... |
|
[2011-03-29] Steve: Good dictionary of course, as was ifs Palm predecessor, but you can't change the font size. Not quite a deal breaker but after all... |
|
[2011-01-20] Mike: Excellent lexicon. All words in app searchable. Rarely updated. Will not integrate with ereader apps like nook. |
|
[2010-12-19] rep: Very good information. User interface is limited and fundamental. The "flash cards" option is broken. I expected more for the HIGH price. Don't buy! |
|
[2010-10-05] A Google User: I would rate as "Excellent," but it is way too expensive (greed disgusts me). |
|
[2010-10-05] Tammy: I would rate as "Excellent," but it is way too expensive (greed disgusts me). |
|
[2010-09-29] Phil: Best dictionary app in Android market. Expensive, but well worth the price. Evo 2.2. |
|
[2010-07-19] A Google User: GREAT dictionary, UGLY widget. |
|
[2010-07-19] AzDayton: GREAT dictionary, UGLY widget. |
|
[2010-04-12] A Google User: The best but too expensive for me. |
|
[2010-04-12] Chang: The best but too expensive for me. |
|
[2010-01-29] A Google User: Found this very useful |
|
[2010-01-29] Erik J: Found this very useful |
|
[2009-12-28] A Google User: I love this app. its not chep but worth the money |
|
[2009-12-28] Melvin: I love this app. its not chep but worth the money |
|
[2009-12-24] A Google User: For the price I would have expected a working side bar when scrolling through the words; otherwise the dictionary is solid. |
|
[2009-12-24] TjK: For the price I would have expected a working side bar when scrolling through the words; otherwise the dictionary is solid. |
|
[2009-12-21] A Google User: Expensive, but indispensible. |
|
[2009-12-21] Antares: Expensive, but indispensible. |
|
[2009-08-27] A Google User: New version is faster. Some of the markup (e.g. example usage) is not implemented. |
|
[2009-08-27] iNoah: New version is faster. Some of the markup (e.g. example usage) is not implemented. |
|
|